Published debates
Debates their authors chose to publish. Each one is a question put to a panel of AI specialists who argue it out, followed by a neutral verdict that names the crux — including where the recommendation stops holding and what would make it fail.
Do real-time dynamic pricing algorithms used by landlords, airlines, and retailers constitute illegal tacit collusion under antitrust law when competitors utilize the same algorithmic pricing vendor, even if no explicit communication occurs between firms?
Under the fact pattern described—landlords, airlines, retailers all feeding confidential internal data into the same vendor’s algorithm and delegating pricing to it—yes, that arrangement is likely to constitute illegal tacit collusion.
Should medical licensing boards mandate that physicians accept high-confidence AI diagnostic recommendations in oncology and radiology unless they document a formal medical justification, or does this erode physician autonomy and distort medical malpractice liability?
Licensing boards should not mandate that physicians accept high-confidence AI diagnostic recommendations.
Should nations mandate that all critical national infrastructure and citizen personal data run exclusively on domestically owned, sovereign cloud architectures, even if it increases operational costs and reduces access to global cutting-edge cloud infrastructure?
Nations should not adopt an exclusive domestic mandate for all critical infrastructure and citizen data.
Should commercial AI developers be legally required to provide financial royalties to human content creators whose copyrighted works were included in training datasets, or does computational ingestion constitute non-infringing fair use under copyright law?
Commercial AI developers should be required to pay financial royalties on copyrighted works used in training.